Early access: 15,549 bills from the current Congress so far, more added daily. Data from Congress.gov, GovInfo and the House and Senate vote records, updated Oct 13, 2026.
Public Law TrackerPLTPublic Law Tracker

H.R. 1789 · Where this bill is now

Waiting for a House vote

Approved by committee Mar 21, 2025; no House vote yet

What this bill does

In plain words · AI-written from the official summary

Legal protections for federal officials expanded

This bill changes the rules for when federal officials can move cases from state court to federal court. Right now, certain federal officers can do this if the charges relate to their official duties. The bill would expand that to include former federal officers and former presidents and vice presidents. It also creates a legal presumption that federal officials are immune from liability in these cases, unless someone can prove their actions weren't actually part of their official job.

How it affects you

This primarily affects current and former federal officials facing state-level prosecutions or civil lawsuits. For most people, this doesn't create a direct change in daily life, though it does shift how the court system handles cases involving federal employees and former presidents or vice presidents when those cases move between state and federal courts.

Read the official summary (Reported to House, Mar 21, 2025)

Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025

This bill expands the types of federal officials who may remove (i.e., transfer) state cases brought against them to federal court. It also establishes a presumption of immunity for federal officials in these cases.

The federal officer removal statute authorizes certain defendants (e.g., federal officers) to remove to federal court a civil action or criminal prosecution brought against them in state court if the claims or charges relate to official duties. Often, defendants who invoke the federal officer removal statute raise claims of official immunity.

In recent years, the statute received public attention when then-former President Donald Trump and former officials sought to invoke the statute. For example, in Georgia v. Meadows , the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows could not remove Georgia’s criminal prosecution of him to federal court based on the federal officer removal statute because it does not apply to former federal officers, and even if it did, the charges were not related to Meadows’s official duties.

This bill allows a defendant who is a former federal officer or current or former President or Vice President to remove state cases brought against them to federal court based on the federal officer removal statute. It also establishes a presumption that federal officials have immunity in cases that are removable, which may only be rebutted by a showing that their actions were not related to official duties.

Written by AI (Claude) using only the official summary by the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress’s nonpartisan research staff. It can miss nuance, so check the official summary and the bill text for details.

119th Congress
1st Session
H. R. 1789

A BILL

Promptly Ending Political Prosecutions and Executive Retaliation Act of 2025

In the HouseNo vote yet

Sponsor: Rep. Russell Fry (R-SC-7) · Introduced Mar 3, 2025 · Law · 2 versions of the text

Sources: Congress.gov actions and votes · bill text from GovInfo · latest official action Mar 21, 2025: “Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 18.”

Sections

Opens on the most recent version where something changed
Sections · 2