H.R. 3160 · Where this bill is now
In committee
Introduced in the House, sent to the Committee on the Judiciary, May 1, 2025
What this bill does
In plain words · AI-written from the official summaryTightens rules for challenging U.S. patents
This bill makes it harder for people to challenge patents at the Patent and Trademark Office through a process called inter partes review, or IPR. It requires judges who decide whether to start an IPR to step aside from deciding its final outcome, limits who can file an IPR challenge, and raises the legal standard for invalidating a patent. The bill also lets universities and nonprofits that own patents pay lower fees when filing with the Patent Office, and it lets the Patent Office keep and spend the fees it collects without asking Congress for permission first.
How it affects you
Patent holders, especially universities and nonprofit research institutions, may face fewer patent challenges and lower filing fees. If you're an inventor or business relying on patents to protect innovations, this could make your patents harder to challenge. People or companies that challenge patents' validity in court proceedings may find it more difficult to do so after losing an administrative challenge at the Patent Office.
Read the official summary (Introduced in House, May 1, 2025)
Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital American Innovation Leadership Act or the PREVAIL Act
This bill addresses various issues relating to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), including by imposing additional requirements on administrative patent validity challenges (proceedings to review and potentially cancel issued patents) at the USPTO.
The bill modifies provisions relating to inter partes reviews (IPRs) and other administrative patent validity proceedings, including by
• prohibiting an administrative patent judge who participated in deciding whether to institute an IPR (i.e., whether to allow the IPR to proceed based on the initial petition) from also participating in deciding the final outcome of the same IPR;
• prohibiting a person (individual or entity) from petitioning for an IPR against a patent unless the person meets certain standing requirements (currently, any person may petition for an IPR);
• prohibiting a person who has challenged a patent's validity in an IPR from raising the same challenges against the patent in other proceedings (e.g., district court) if the IPR has been instituted; and
• raising the burden that the petitioner in an IPR must meet to invalidate a previously issued patent claim.
The bill also makes institutions of higher education (IHEs) and nonprofit entities that hold patents on behalf of IHEs eligible for reduced patent-related fees, including filing fees. (Currently, employees of IHEs are eligible for reduced fees but not the IHEs themselves.)
The bill also makes fees collected by the USPTO available for the USPTO's use without further appropriations from Congress.
Written by AI (Claude) using only the official summary by the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress’s nonpartisan research staff. It can miss nuance, so check the official summary and the bill text for details.
1st SessionH. R. 3160
A BILL
PREVAIL Act
Sponsor: Rep. Nathaniel Moran (R-TX-1) · Introduced May 1, 2025 · Commerce · 1 version of the text
Sources: Congress.gov actions and votes · bill text from GovInfo · latest official action May 1, 2025: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.”
Sections
Sections · 9
- Sec. 1Short titleNo change
- Sec. 2FindingsNo change
- Sec. 3Patent trial and appeal boardNo change
- Sec. 4Inter partes reviewNo change
- Sec. 5Post-grant reviewNo change
- Sec. 6Reexamination of patentsNo change
- Sec. 7Elimination of USPTO fee diversionNo change
- Sec. 8Institutions of higher educationNo change
- Sec. 9Assisting small businesses in the United States patent systemNo change