S. 263 · Where this bill is now
In committee
Introduced in the Senate, Jan 27, 2025
What this bill does
In plain words · AI-written from the official summaryStricter rules for seizing property in crimes
When the federal government seizes someone's property during a criminal investigation, they have to follow tougher rules. The government now has to tell the property owner much faster that their stuff was taken, has to prove it's connected to a crime at a higher standard, and has to appoint a lawyer for property owners who can't afford one. The bill also changes where the money from forfeited property goes and stops the federal government from sharing those funds with state and local police departments.
How it affects you
If federal law enforcement seizes your property during a criminal case, you'd get notified sooner and would have a lawyer appointed to help you challenge the seizure if you can't afford one. The changes make it harder for the government to keep your property without stronger proof it's connected to a crime. Most people won't be directly affected unless they're involved in a federal case where property is seized.
Read the official summary (Introduced in Senate, Jan 27, 2025)
Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration Act of 2025 or the FAIR Act of 2025
This bill establishes more stringent requirements for the federal government with respect to civil asset forfeiture. Civil asset forfeiture generally refers to the seizure and forfeiture of property in connection with federal crimes.
Specifically, the bill makes various changes to the general rules governing civil forfeiture proceedings. Among the changes, the bill
• generally requires the government to notify interested parties within 7 days (currently, 60 days) of a seizure,
• requires an indigent property owner to be represented by counsel regardless of whether the owner requests counsel,
• requires the government to meet a higher evidentiary standard in order to prove that seized property is connected to a crime, and
• expands the factors courts must consider in determining whether a forfeiture of property is constitutionally excessive.
Additionally, the bill eliminates statutory authority for equitable sharing (i.e., sharing of federally forfeited assets with state, local, or tribal law enforcement agencies that participate in law enforcement efforts resulting in a forfeiture). It directs forfeiture proceeds to be deposited into the general fund of the Treasury instead of the Department of Justice (DOJ) Assets Forfeiture Fund.
The bill requires a prompt probable cause hearing following the seizure of money involved in a structuring offense (i.e., structuring currency transactions to evade currency reporting requirements).
Finally, the bill requires the annual report on deposits to the DOJ Assets Forfeiture Fund to specify total deposits from each type of forfeiture.
Written by AI (Claude) using only the official summary by the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress’s nonpartisan research staff. It can miss nuance, so check the official summary and the bill text for details.
1st SessionS. 263
A BILL
FAIR Act of 2025
Sponsor: Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) · Introduced Jan 27, 2025 · Crime and Law Enforcement · 1 version of the text
Sources: Congress.gov actions and votes · bill text from GovInfo · latest official action Jan 27, 2025: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.”
Sections
Sections · 7
- Sec. 1Short titleNo change
- Sec. 2Civil forfeiture and nonjudicial forfeitureNo change
- Sec. 3Disposition of forfeited propertyNo change
- Sec. 4Department of justice assets forfeiture fund depositsNo change
- Sec. 5Structuring transactions to evade reporting requirement prohibitedNo change
- Sec. 6Reporting requirementsNo change
- Sec. 7ApplicabilityNo change