Early access: 15,549 bills from the current Congress so far, more added daily. Data from Congress.gov, GovInfo and the House and Senate vote records, updated Oct 13, 2026.
Public Law TrackerPLTPublic Law Tracker

S. 3663 · Where this bill is now

In committee

Introduced in the Senate, Jan 15, 2026

What this bill does

In plain words · AI-written from the official summary

Strengthens privacy rules for secret government data requests

When the government wants to see your emails or other private information held by a tech company, it can ask the court for a special order that keeps the company from telling you about the request. Right now, the government doesn't have to meet a very high bar to get this order. This bill makes it harder for the government to get and keep these secret orders by requiring judges to set a stricter standard, write down their reasoning, and make sure the orders only last 90 days (or up to a year in child safety cases).

How it affects you

If you use email or cloud storage, this affects how much privacy protection you have. Tech companies will be more likely to tell you when the government asks for your information, because the government will have a tougher time keeping those requests secret. Journalists and people engaged in protected activities like protest or advocacy may see particular benefit, since the bill requires the government to report on whether these groups are being targeted.

Read the official summary (Introduced in Senate, Jan 15, 2026)

NDO Fairness Act of 2026

This bill increases the requirements the government must meet to obtain a nondisclosure order (NDO) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA).

The SCA generally prohibits providers of remote computing services or electronic communication services (providers) from disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e.g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes the government seek a warrant, order, or subpoena to compel providers to disclose electronic communications or records or information pertaining to customers or subscribers during an investigation. Providers may notify customers and subscribers of the warrant, order, or subpoena unless the government obtains a court order—an NDO—that delays the notification.

This bill raises the standard the government must meet to obtain (or extend) an NDO. The bill also requires the court, before issuing an NDO, to issue a written determination that the standard was met based on specific and articulable facts, and to review the underlying warrant, order, or subpoena.

The bill requires NDOs to be narrowly tailored. It also limits their duration to 90 days for most investigations, though it permits a duration of up to one year for investigations pertaining to an offense involving child pornography or sexual exploitation of children.

Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on NDO-related data, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; applications for orders; orders granted, extended, or denied; and orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.

Written by AI (Claude) using only the official summary by the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress’s nonpartisan research staff. It can miss nuance, so check the official summary and the bill text for details.

119th Congress
2nd Session
S. 3663

A BILL

NDO Fairness Act of 2026

In the SenateNo vote yet

Sponsor: Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-DE) · Introduced Jan 15, 2026 · Crime and Law Enforcement · 1 version of the text

Sources: Congress.gov actions and votes · bill text from GovInfo · latest official action Jan 15, 2026: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.”

Sections

Sections · 2