Early access: 15,549 bills from the current Congress so far, more added daily. Data from Congress.gov, GovInfo and the House and Senate vote records, updated Oct 13, 2026.
Public Law TrackerPLTPublic Law Tracker
H.R. 7638IntroducedHouse · nowSenatePresidentLawIn committee
Sec. 2 · H.R. 7638

Civil forfeiture and nonjudicial forfeiture

Read this section in the full bill →

This section appears in one version only, so there is nothing to compare yet.

Section 983 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the subsection heading, by striking claim;; (B) in paragraph (1)— (i) in subparagraph (A)— (I) in clause (i)— (aa) by striking clauses (ii) through (v), in any nonjudicial and inserting clause (ii), in any; and (bb) by striking 60 and inserting 7; (II) by striking clauses (ii) through (v); and (III) by inserting after clause (i) the following: (ii) If the identity or interest of a party is not determined until after the seizure or turnover but is determined before a declaration of forfeiture is entered, the Government shall determine the identity and address of the party or interest within 7 days after the seizure or turnover, and notice shall be sent to such interested party not later than 7 days after the determination by the Government of the identity and address of the party or the party's interest.; (ii) by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C); (iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (F) as subparagraphs (B) through (D), respectively; and (iv) in subparagraph (C), as so redesignated, by striking nonjudicial; (C) by striking paragraph (2); (D) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively; and (E) in paragraph (2)(A), as so redesignated— (i) by striking 90 and inserting 30; and (ii) by striking after a claim has been filed and inserting after the date of the seizure; (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows: (A) If a person with standing to contest the forfeiture of property in a civil forfeiture proceeding under a civil forfeiture statute is— (i) financially unable to obtain representation by counsel; or (ii) the cost of obtaining representation would exceed the value of the seized property, the court may authorize or appoint counsel to represent that person with respect to the claim.; (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting or appoint after authorize; and (C) in paragraph (2)(A)— (i) by striking in a judicial civil forfeiture proceeding and inserting in a civil forfeiture proceeding; (ii) by inserting under paragraph (1) after counsel; (iii) by striking, and the property subject to forfeiture is real property that is being used by the person as a primary residence,; and (iv) by striking, at the request of the person, shall insure and inserting shall ensure; (3) in subsection (c)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking a preponderance of the evidence and inserting clear and convincing evidence; (B) in paragraph (2), by striking a preponderance of the evidence and inserting clear and convincing evidence; and (C) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following: (3) if the Government's theory of forfeiture is that the property was used to commit or facilitate the commission of a criminal offense, or was involved in the commission of a criminal offense, the Government shall establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that— (A) there was a substantial connection between the property and the offense; and (B) the owner of any interest in the seized property— (i) used the property with intent to facilitate the offense; or (ii) knowingly consented or was willfully blind to the use of the property by another in connection with the offense.; (4) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: The Government shall have the burden of proving that the claimant is not an innocent owner by a preponderance of the evidence.; and (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking an owner who and all that follows through upon learning and inserting an owner who, upon learning; and (ii) in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting before For purposes of this paragraph the following: If the Government satisfies its burden under paragraph (1), the claimant may rebut the Government’s evidence related to his innocent ownership, including by showing that he did all that could reasonably be expected under the law.; (5) in subsection (e)— (A) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)— (i) by striking nonjudicial; and (ii) by striking a declaration and inserting an order; (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking declaration and inserting order; and (ii) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following: (B) Any proceeding described in subparagraph (A) shall be commenced within 6 months of the entry of the order granting the motion.; and (C) by striking paragraph (5); (6) in subsection (f)(1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking (a) and inserting (a)(3)(A); (7) in subsection (g)— (A) in paragraph (1), by striking (a)(4) and inserting (a)(3); and (B) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: (2) In making this determination, the court shall consider such factors as— (A) the seriousness of the offense; (B) the extent of the nexus of the property to the offense; (C) the range of sentences available for the offense giving rise to forfeiture; (D) the fair market value of the property; and (E) the hardship to the property owner and dependents.; and (8) by adding at the end the following: (k) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law— (A) no Federal seizing agency may conduct nonjudicial forfeitures; (B) no property may be subject to forfeiture except through judicial process; and (C) no order of forfeiture may be entered except by a United States district court. (2) In this subsection, the term nonjudicial forfeiture means an in rem action that permits the Federal seizing agency to start a forfeiture without judicial involvement..

Sec. 2: Civil forfeiture and nonjudicial forfeiture · Public Law Tracker