Early access: 15,549 bills from the current Congress so far, more added daily. Data from Congress.gov, GovInfo and the House and Senate vote records, updated Oct 13, 2026.
Public Law TrackerPLTPublic Law Tracker
H.Res. 1105IntroducedHouse · nowIn committee
Section · H.Res. 1105

Article II: Dereliction of Duty and Obstruction of Justice

Read this section in the full bill →

This section appears in one version only, so there is nothing to compare yet.

The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives shall have the sole Power of Impeachment and that civil Officers of the United States, including the Attorney General of the United States of America, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. In her conduct while Attorney General of the United States of America, Pamela Jo Bondi, in violation of her oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, to bear true faith and allegiance to the same, and to well and faithfully discharge the duties of her office, has willfully and systematically refused to comply with the law, in that— (1) On February 10, 2025, the Department of Justice moved to drop criminal corruption charges against Eric Adams, who was serving as Mayor of New York City at the time. In response to the Department of Justice’s directive to drop criminal corruption charges against Eric Adams, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Danielle Renee Sassoon, the lead prosecutor against Eric Adams, Hagan Scotten, the acting head of the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, Kevin Driscoll, the acting head of the Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section, John Keller, and three other prosecutors within the Public Integrity Section resigned from their positions. Many have speculated that this decision to drop charges against Eric Adams was a quid pro quo: Eric Adams would comply with, and even assist, the Trump administration’s immigration policies in exchange for not facing consequences for corruption. (2) In May 2025, in violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution, Pamela Jo Bondi signed a legal opinion that authorized the transfer of a $400 million Qatari jet meant for Donald Trump, the sitting President of the United States of America. As stated in article I, section 9, clause 8 of the United States Constitution, no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present…from any King, Prince, or foreign State. The official cost of retrofitting the foreign jet to meet security requirements has not been released, and Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told lawmakers that the funds would come from the Sentinel Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Program, which is intended to replace the aging nuclear missile arsenal. By not recusing herself, as the Chief Legal Officer of the United States, Pamela Jo Bondi violated her fiduciary duty in the matter by virtue of her prior experience serving as a registered foreign lobbyist on behalf of the Government of Qatar. To write a legal opinion on behalf of the United States that authorizes the acceptance of a gift from a former client and a foreign government is a blatant conflict of interest. As of February 13, 2026, the United States Congress has not authorized the acceptance of this gift and has not authorized the transfer of funds appropriated from the Sentinel Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Program to be used in retrofitting the jet to be used by Donald Trump. (3) On September 20, 2025, the Department of Justice closed its Federal probe into Tom Homan, who was allegedly recorded on video by undercover FBI agents accepting a $50,000 cash bribe. Tom Homan, who at the time of the FBI operation was being tagged for the Border Czar position under President Donald Trump, allegedly guaranteed Federal Government contracts in exchange for cash. When questioned under oath about the FBI probe and its closure by Senate Judiciary Committee members, Pamela Jo Bondi refused to answer whether the FBI received the $50,000 back from Homan, if Homan reported the $50,000 on his taxes, or if Tom Homan committed a crime. By closing the FBI probe into Tom Homan, Pamela Jo Bondi failed to discharge her duties as Attorney General of the United States of America. She obstructed the legal system from carrying out a thorough investigation and trial by a jury of Mr. Homan’s peers to determine his innocence. (4) In 2025, senior leaders within the Department of Justice advised the Department of Homeland Security to violate existing injunctions from Federal courts regarding deportation flights to El Salvador. According to whistleblower disclosures from the former Acting Deputy Director for the Department of Justice’s Civil Division’s Office of Immigration Litigation, Erez Reuveni, they were directed by senior leadership to ignore court orders, misrepresent facts and make false statements in court, and to stop sending emails to other Federal agencies, as their emails could be subject to Freedom of Information Act requests. (5) In 2025, on numerous occasions, the Department of Justice took direct action that benefited court cases that Pamela Jo Bondi’s brother, Brad Bondi, was representing. In August 2025, the Department of Justice moved to dismiss charges against a Florida woman whom Brad Bondi represented, and the case was later dropped. Later that same month, the Department of Justice dropped charges against a Missouri property developer who was facing felony wire fraud charges and was represented by Brad Bondi. No evidence has been presented that Pamela Jo Bondi recused herself from the Department of Justice’s decision to take direct action in cases involving Brad Bondi, raising serious ethical concerns. In all of this, Pamela Jo Bondi has obstructed justice and, in dereliction of her duty as the Attorney General of the United States of America, failed to abide by the rule of law. Pamela Jo Bondi has shielded political and personal allies from the law and covered for Donald Trump’s unlawful activities. Wherefore, Pamela Jo Bondi, by such conduct, has demonstrated that she is unfit to fulfill the duties of Attorney General of the United States of America impartially, and will remain a threat to the Constitution and the rule of law if allowed to remain in office. Pamela Jo Bondi thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

Section: Article II: Dereliction of Duty and Obstruction of Justice · Public Law Tracker