Advance congressional notification and litigation
Division B — Restoring Checks and Balances, Accountability, and Transparency › Title XXII — Reasserting Congressional Power of the Purse › Subtitle A — Strengthening Congressional Control and Review To Prevent Impoundment
Read this section in the full bill →
This section appears in one version only, so there is nothing to compare yet.
Section 1016 of the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 687) is amended to read as follows: 1016. Suits by Comptroller General (a) In general If, under this title, budget authority is required to be made available for obligation and such budget authority is not made available for obligation or information, documentation, views, or access are required to be produced and such information, documentation, views, or access are not produced, the Comptroller General is expressly empowered, through attorneys selected by the Comptroller General, to bring a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to require such budget authority to be made available for obligation or such information, documentation, views, or access to be produced. (b) Court authority In a civil action under subsection (a), the court is expressly empowered to enter, against any department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States, any decree, judgment, or order which may be necessary or appropriate to make such budget authority available for obligation or compel production of such information, documentation, views, or access. (c) Notice No civil action shall be brought by the Comptroller General to require budget authority be made available under this section until the expiration of 15 calendar days following the date on which an explanatory statement by the Comptroller General of the circumstances giving rise to the action contemplated is filed with the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate, except that expiration of such period shall not be required if the Comptroller General finds (and incorporates the finding in the explanatory statement filed) that such delay would be contrary to the public interest..