Early access: 15,547 bills from the current Congress so far, more added daily. Data from Congress.gov, GovInfo and the House and Senate vote records, updated Oct 13, 2026.
Public Law TrackerPLTPublic Law Tracker

H.J.Res. 1 · Where this bill is now

Failed in the House

Failed Sep 2, 2026

What this bill does

In plain words · AI-written from the official summary

Locks Supreme Court at nine justices

This is a proposed constitutional amendment that would set the number of Supreme Court justices in stone. Right now, Congress can change how many justices sit on the Court, but this amendment would require exactly nine justices—one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices—and it couldn't be changed without another constitutional amendment.

How it affects you

This doesn't have an immediate effect on most people's daily lives. It's a structural change about how the Court itself works. If it passed, it would prevent future Congresses from adding or removing justices to shift the Court's makeup, but that would mainly matter to people focused on how the judicial system is organized.

Read the official summary (Introduced in House, Jan 3, 2025)

This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment requiring the Supreme Court to be composed of nine Justices—one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices.

Written by AI (Claude) using only the official summary by the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress’s nonpartisan research staff. It can miss nuance, so check the official summary and the bill text for details.

119th Congress
1st Session
H.J.Res. 1

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices.

Failed in HouseSep 2, 2026

Sponsor: Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ-5) · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Law · 2 versions of the text

Sources: Congress.gov actions and votes · bill text from GovInfo · latest official action Sep 2, 2026: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 212 - 206 (Roll no. 293).”

How Congress voted

Official roll calls

House · On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass · Sep 2, 2026

Motion to Failed 212–206

YesNoDidn’t vote
PartyYesNoDidn’t vote
Democrats12058
Independents010
Republicans21107

1 member voted against most of their party: 1 Democrats voted Yes.

Source: Clerk of the House · roll call 293

212–206Failed
DemocratsRepublicans

Congress votes on whole bills and amendments, not on single sections.

Sections

The wording of this bill hasn’t changed across its 2 official versions.

Sections · 1