H.R. 29 · Where this bill is now
Became law through another bill
Its text was included in S. 5, Public Law 119-1 (per the Congressional Research Service). This bill number itself: In the Senate.
What this bill does
In plain words · AI-written from the official summaryRequires detention of certain non-citizens arrested for theft
This bill would require the Department of Homeland Security to detain people who are in the U.S. illegally or lack proper admission documents if they've been arrested for, charged with, or convicted of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The bill also gives state governments the power to sue the federal government if they believe immigration enforcement decisions or failures have harmed the state or its residents, including causing financial harm of more than $100.
How it affects you
If you're a state official or resident in a state with concerns about federal immigration enforcement, this bill would allow your state to take legal action against the federal government. For most people, the law would mainly affect how immigration authorities handle individuals arrested for certain theft-related crimes.
Read the official summary (Introduced in House, Jan 3, 2025)
Laken Riley Act
This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain certain non-U.S. nationals ( aliens under federal law) who have been arrested for burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The bill also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement.
Under this bill, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting.
The bill also authorizes state governments to sue for injunctive relief over certain immigration-related decisions or alleged failures by the federal government if the decision or failure caused the state or its residents harm, including financial harm of more than $100. Specifically, the state government may sue the federal government over a
• decision to release a non-U.S. national from custody;
• failure to fulfill requirements relating to inspecting individuals seeking admission into the United States, including requirements related to asylum interviews;
• failure to fulfill a requirement to stop issuing visas to nationals of a country that unreasonably denies or delays acceptance of nationals of that country;
• violation of limitations on immigration parole, such as the requirement that parole be granted only on a case-by-case basis; or
• failure to detain an individual who has been ordered removed from the United States.
Written by AI (Claude) using only the official summary by the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress’s nonpartisan research staff. It can miss nuance, so check the official summary and the bill text for details.
1st SessionH. R. 29
AN ACT
Laken Riley Act
Sponsor: Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA-10) · Introduced Jan 3, 2025 · Immigration · 3 versions of the text
Sources: Congress.gov actions and votes · bill text from GovInfo · latest official action Feb 10, 2025: “Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 10.”
How Congress voted
Official roll callsHouse · On Passage · Jan 7, 2025
Passage Passed 264–159
| Party | Yes | No | Didn’t vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats | 48 | 159 | 8 |
| Republicans | 216 | 0 | 3 |
48 members voted against most of their party: 48 Democrats voted Yes.
Source: Clerk of the House · roll call 6
Congress votes on whole bills and amendments, not on single sections.
Sections
The wording of this bill hasn’t changed across its 3 official versions.