Early access: 15,547 bills from the current Congress so far, more added daily. Data from Congress.gov, GovInfo and the House and Senate vote records, updated Oct 13, 2026.
Public Law TrackerPLTPublic Law Tracker

S. 32 · Where this bill is now

Became law

Public Law 119-109, Sep 16, 2026

What this bill does

In plain words · AI-written from the official summary

Courts added to Texas and California

This bill adds two locations where federal courts must hold sessions. College Station will be added to the Galveston Division of the Southern District of Texas, and El Centro will be added to the Southern District of California. This means people in these areas won't have to travel as far to access federal courts.

How it affects you

If you live in or near College Station, Texas or El Centro, California, you'll have closer access to federal court proceedings instead of having to travel to distant court locations. People involved in federal legal matters in these areas—whether as defendants, plaintiffs, jurors, or witnesses—would benefit from having court sessions available locally.

Read the official summary (Public Law, Sep 16, 2026)

Local Access to Courts Act or LACA

This act adds College Station to the list of places where court must be held in the Galveston Division of the Southern District of Texas.

Additionally, the act adds El Centro to the list of places where court must be held in the Southern District of California.

Written by AI (Claude) using only the official summary by the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress’s nonpartisan research staff. It can miss nuance, so check the official summary and the bill text for details.

119th Congress
1st Session
S. 32

AN ACT

LACA

Passed SenateFeb 12, 2025 · unanimous consentPassed HouseAug 31, 2026 · 378–10Public Law 119-109Sep 16, 2026

Sponsor: Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) · Introduced Jan 8, 2025 · Law · 3 versions of the text

Sources: Congress.gov actions and votes · bill text from GovInfo · latest official action Sep 16, 2026: “Became Public Law No: 119-109.”

How Congress voted

Official roll calls

House · On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass · Aug 31, 2026

Motion to Passed 378–10

YesNoDidn’t vote
PartyYesNoDidn’t vote
Democrats191021
Independents100
Republicans1861021

10 members voted against most of their party: 10 Republicans voted No.

Source: Clerk of the House · roll call 285

378–10Passed
DemocratsRepublicans

Congress votes on whole bills and amendments, not on single sections.

Sections

The wording of this bill hasn’t changed across its 3 official versions.

Sections · 3