Environmental infrastructure
Division A — Water resources development › Title III — Deauthorizations and Modifications
Read this section in the full bill →
No wording changed between Introduced and Committee version.
How the text changed
(a) Form of assistance Section 219(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835) is amended, in the second sentence of the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting, or in the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs after design assistance. (b) New projects Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1258; 136 Stat. 3808; 138 Stat. 3115) is amended by adding at the end the following: (599) Nelson Lagoon, Alaska $3,300,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, water supply, and water storage, Nelson Lagoon, Alaska. (600) Ouzinkie, Alaska $2,100,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, Ouzinkie, Alaska. (601) Soldotna, Alaska $1,300,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure (including facilities for water reclamation, withdrawal, treatment, and distribution), Soldotna, Alaska. (602) Sitka, Alaska $7,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure (including facilities for water reclamation, withdrawal, treatment, and distribution), City and Borough of Sitka, Alaska. (603) Kingman, Arizona $10,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Kingman, Arizona. (604) Santa Cruz County, Arizona $10,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, sewer and water lines, water reclamation, and water treatment and distribution, Santa Cruz County, Arizona. (605) Camrosa Water District, Ventura County, California $3,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, Camrosa Water District, Ventura County, California. (606) San Mateo County, California $5,000,000 for water, stormwater, and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, San Mateo County, California. (607) Silicon Valley clean water, San Mateo County, California $2,222,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including measures for water treatment and water quality, Silicon Valley Clean Water, San Mateo County, California. (608) Sonoma County, California $3,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Sonoma County, California. (609) Sutter County, California $3,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Sutter County, California. (610) Sacramento County, California $2,222,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water treatment, Carmichael Water District, Sacramento County, California. (611) Orange County, California $2,222,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply and groundwater recharge, Orange County Water District, Orange County, California. (612) Santa Margarita Water District, Orange County, California $2,222,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water treatment, water reclamation, and water supply, Santa Margarita Water District, Orange County, California. (613) Los Angeles County, California $2,222,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply and water treatment, Water Replenishment District, Los Angeles County, California. (614) Foothill Municipal Water District, Los Angeles County, California $2,222,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water storage, Foothill Municipal Water District, Los Angeles County, California. (615) San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California $2,222,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply and groundwater recharge, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California. (616) Custer County, Colorado $10,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, Custer County, Colorado. (617) Aurora, Colorado $10,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, City of Aurora, Colorado. (618) Jewett City, Connecticut $13,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Borough of Jewett City, Connecticut. (619) Windham, Connecticut $13,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and water storage, Town of Windham, Connecticut. (620) Rock Island County, Illinois $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Rock Island County, Illinois. (621) Cook County, Illinois $2,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, Cook County, Illinois. (622) Chicago, Illinois $1,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply, City of Chicago, Illinois. (623) Mattoon, Illinois $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply and water quality enhancements, City of Mattoon, Illinois. (624) Maumee River Basin, Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan $20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, and stormwater management, Maumee River Basin, Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan. (625) Ogallala Aquifer, Kansas $30,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including wastewater treatment, aquifer storage and recovery infrastructure, and surface water resource protection, Ogallala Aquifer, Kansas. (626) Bossier City, Louisiana $10,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, and water treatment, Bossier City, Louisiana. (627) Holyoke, Massachusetts $15,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, City of Holyoke, Massachusetts. (628) Somerset, Massachusetts $2,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Town of Somerset, Massachusetts. (629) Greenfield, Massachusetts $9,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, City of Greenfield, Massachusetts. (630) Swansea, Massachusetts $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply and water quality enhancements, Swansea, Massachusetts. (631) Rochester, Minnesota $10,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water storage and water supply, and water quality enhancements, City of Rochester, Minnesota. (632) Brandon, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Brandon, Mississippi. (633) Choctaw County, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure (including stormwater management), drainage systems, and water quality enhancements, Choctaw County, Mississippi. (634) Columbus, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Columbus, Mississippi. (635) Flowood, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, stormwater management, drainage systems, and water quality enhancements, City of Flowood, Mississippi. (636) Forest, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Forest, Mississippi. (637) Hattiesburg, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure (including stormwater management), drainage systems, and water quality enhancements, Hattiesburg, Mississippi. (638) Lucedale, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, stormwater management, drainage systems, and water quality enhancements, City of Lucedale, Mississippi. (639) Natchez, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, stormwater management, drainage systems, and water quality enhancements, City of Natchez, Mississippi. (640) Vicksburg, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, stormwater management, water supply, and water quality enhancements, City of Vicksburg, Mississippi. (641) Jackson County, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, and stormwater management, Jackson County, Mississippi. (642) West Point, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, rehabilitation of storage tanks, system pressure improvements, and water treatment upgrades, City of West Point, Mississippi. (643) Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Passaic, and Union Counties, New Jersey $8,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water quality enhancements, in the communities served by the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission, Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Passaic, and Union Counties, New Jersey. (644) Gloucester City, New Jersey $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including flooding resiliency measures for such infrastructure, and environmental restoration, City of Gloucester City, New Jersey. (645) Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico $1,500,000 for water infrastructure, including water supply and water storage, Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico. (646) Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico $3,000,000 for water infrastructure, including water supply, water storage, and water treatment, Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico. (647) Nassau County, New York $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Nassau County, New York. (648) Suffolk County, New York $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Suffolk County, New York. (649) Westchester County, New York $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Westchester County, New York. (650) Tompkins County, New York $3,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Tompkins County, New York. (651) Onondoga County, New York $3,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Onondoga County, New York. (652) Oswego County, New York $3,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Oswego County, New York. (653) Grand Island, New York $2,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Town of Grand Island, New York. (654) Asheville, North Carolina $15,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, water supply, and stormwater management, City of Asheville, North Carolina. (655) Greenville, North Carolina $10,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Greenville, North Carolina. (656) Brown County, Ohio $2,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including drinking water infrastructure, Brown County, Ohio. (657) Clarksburg, Ohio $2,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, Clarksburg, Ohio. (658) Jefferson County, Ohio $6,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, drinking water infrastructure, and water supply, Jefferson County, Ohio. (659) Massillon, Ohio $2,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water quality improvements, City of Massillon, Ohio. (660) Struthers, Ohio $3,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Struthers, Ohio. (661) Trumbull County, Ohio $2,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water quality improvements, Trumbull County, Ohio. (662) Waverly, Ohio $3,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, and water supply, Waverly, Ohio. (663) Wellston, Ohio $6,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, and water supply, City of Wellston, Ohio. (664) Willamette Valley, Oregon $33,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply, water treatment, and water storage, Willamette Valley, Oregon. (665) Rhode island (A) In general $71,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure (including water supply, storage, treatment, and distribution facilities), resource protection and development, environmental restoration, and other environmental infrastructure assistance in Rhode Island. (B) Economically disadvantaged communities Notwithstanding subsection (b), the Federal share of the cost of a project under this paragraph benefitting an economically disadvantaged community (as defined pursuant to section 160 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note; Public Law 116–260)) shall be 90 percent. (666) Berkeley County, South Carolina $20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, Berkeley County, South Carolina. (667) Centerville, Utah $20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, water supply, stormwater management, water quality enhancements, and aquifer storage and recovery infrastructure, City of Centerville, Utah. (668) Ephraim, Utah $20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Ephraim, Utah. (669) Fairfax County and Prince William County, Virginia $8,666,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water reclamation and resource protection and development, in the communities served by the Upper Occoquan Service Authority, Fairfax County and Prince William County, Virginia. (670) Orange County, Virginia $8,666,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water treatment and storage, Orange County, Virginia. (671) Henrico County, Virginia $8,666,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Henrico County, Virginia. (672) Camas, Washington $4,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water quality enhancements, City of Camas, Washington. (673) Quincy, Washington $4,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including aquifer storage and recovery, City of Quincy, Washington. (674) Airway Heights, Washington $3,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply, water treatment, and water quality enhancements, City of Airway Heights, Washington. (675) Sunnyside, Washington $2,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, City of Sunnyside, Washington.. (c) Project modifications (1) Consistency with reports Congress finds that the project modifications described in this subsection are in accordance with the reports submitted to Congress by the Secretary under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), entitled Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development, or have otherwise been reviewed by Congress. (2) Modifications (A) Buckeye, Arizona Section 219(f)(406) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking $12,000,000 and inserting $20,000,000. (B) Page, Arizona Section 219(f)(409) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking $10,000,000 and inserting $20,000,000. (C) Tucson, Arizona Section 219(f)(412) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking $30,000,000 and inserting $35,000,000. (D) Butte County, California Section 219(f)(419) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking $50,000,000 and inserting $53,000,000. (E) San Bernardino County, California Section 219(f)(101) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1260; 138 Stat. 3128) is amended— (i) by striking $24,000,000 and inserting $27,000,000; (ii) by inserting, stormwater, after wastewater; and (iii) by striking Chino and Chino Hills,. (F) Salinas, California Section 219(f)(450) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3118) is amended— (i) by striking $20,000,000 and inserting $22,222,000; and (ii) by inserting and stormwater infrastructure, including flood resiliency measures for such infrastructure, after water supply,. (G) Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, Bay–Delta, California Section 219(f)(416) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended— (i) by inserting environmental restoration, resource protection and development, after drainage systems,; and (ii) by striking Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and inserting Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. (H) Santa Monica, California Section 219(f)(103) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1260) is amended— (i) by striking $3,000,000 and inserting $5,222,000; and (ii) by inserting and stormwater management and water quality enhancements after reliability. (I) Montezuma and La Plata Counties, Colorado Section 219(f)(110) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1260) is amended— (i) by striking $1,000,000 and inserting $7,000,000; and (ii) by inserting and for water supply after project. (J) Muscogee, Henry, and Clayton Counties, Georgia Section 219(f)(477) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3120) is amended by striking $10,000,000 and inserting $20,000,000. (K) East Point, Georgia Section 219(f)(136) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1261; 138 Stat. 3129) is amended by striking $20,000,000 and inserting $23,000,000. (L) Atlanta, Georgia Section 219(e)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3129) is amended by striking $100,000,000 and inserting $110,000,000. (M) DeKalb County, Georgia Section 219(f)(479) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3120) is amended by striking $40,000,000 and inserting $43,000,000. (N) Cook County and Lake County, Illinois Section 219(f)(54) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3129) is amended by striking $149,000,000 and inserting $162,000,000. (O) Maryland Section 219(f)(341) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3812) is amended by striking $100,000,000 and inserting $113,000,000. (P) Haverhill, Massachusetts Section 219(f)(337) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3812; 138 Stat. 3130) is amended by striking $30,000,000 and inserting $37,000,000. (Q) Michigan Section 219(f)(157)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1262; 136 Stat. 3818; 138 Stat. 3130) is amended by striking $160,000,000 and inserting $186,000,000. (R) Clinton, Raymond, and Bolton, Mississippi Section 219(f)(350) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended— (i) in the paragraph heading, by inserting Raymond, and Bolton, after Clinton,; (ii) by striking $13,600,000 and inserting $18,600,000; and (iii) by striking the city of Clinton, Mississippi and inserting the cities of Clinton and Raymond and the town of Bolton, Mississippi. (S) Madison County, Mississippi Section 219(f)(351) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3813; 138 Stat. 3131) is amended by striking $24,000,000 and inserting $29,000,000. (T) Oxford, Mississippi Section 219(f)(353) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended by striking $10,000,000 and inserting $15,000,000. (U) Picayune, Mississippi Section 219(f)(512) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3122) is amended by striking $5,000,000 and inserting $10,000,000. (V) New Hampshire Section 219(f)(518) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3122) is amended by striking $25,000,000 and inserting $30,000,000. (W) Farmington, New Mexico Section 219(f)(372) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3814) is amended by inserting and stormwater management after water supply,. (X) Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina Section 219(f)(194) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1264) is amended— (i) by striking $6,000,000 and inserting $11,000,000; and (ii) by inserting and water supply after sewer upgrades. (Y) Toledo and Oregon, Ohio Section 219(f)(565) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3125) is amended by striking $10,500,000 and inserting $45,000,000. (Z) Charleston, South Carolina Section 219(f)(391) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3815) is amended by striking $25,583,000 and inserting $45,583,000. (AA) Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 138 Stat. 3132) is amended by striking $235,000,000 and inserting $240,000,000.
(a) Form of assistance Section 219(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835) is amended, in the second sentence of the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting, or in the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs after design assistance. (b) New projects Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1258; 136 Stat. 3808; 138 Stat. 3115) is amended by adding at the end the following: (599) Nelson Lagoon, Alaska $3,300,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, water supply, and water storage, Nelson Lagoon, Alaska. (600) Ouzinkie, Alaska $2,100,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, Ouzinkie, Alaska. (601) Soldotna, Alaska $1,300,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure (including facilities for water reclamation, withdrawal, treatment, and distribution), Soldotna, Alaska. (602) Sitka, Alaska $7,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure (including facilities for water reclamation, withdrawal, treatment, and distribution), City and Borough of Sitka, Alaska. (603) Kingman, Arizona $10,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Kingman, Arizona. (604) Santa Cruz County, Arizona $10,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, sewer and water lines, water reclamation, and water treatment and distribution, Santa Cruz County, Arizona. (605) Camrosa Water District, Ventura County, California $3,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, Camrosa Water District, Ventura County, California. (606) San Mateo County, California $5,000,000 for water, stormwater, and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, San Mateo County, California. (607) Silicon Valley clean water, San Mateo County, California $2,222,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including measures for water treatment and water quality, Silicon Valley Clean Water, San Mateo County, California. (608) Sonoma County, California $3,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Sonoma County, California. (609) Sutter County, California $3,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, Sutter County, California. (610) Sacramento County, California $2,222,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water treatment, Carmichael Water District, Sacramento County, California. (611) Orange County, California $2,222,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply and groundwater recharge, Orange County Water District, Orange County, California. (612) Santa Margarita Water District, Orange County, California $2,222,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water treatment, water reclamation, and water supply, Santa Margarita Water District, Orange County, California. (613) Los Angeles County, California $2,222,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply and water treatment, Water Replenishment District, Los Angeles County, California. (614) Foothill Municipal Water District, Los Angeles County, California $2,222,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water storage, Foothill Municipal Water District, Los Angeles County, California. (615) San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California $2,222,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply and groundwater recharge, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California. (616) Custer County, Colorado $10,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, Custer County, Colorado. (617) Aurora, Colorado $10,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, City of Aurora, Colorado. (618) Jewett City, Connecticut $13,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Borough of Jewett City, Connecticut. (619) Windham, Connecticut $13,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and water storage, Town of Windham, Connecticut. (620) Rock Island County, Illinois $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Rock Island County, Illinois. (621) Cook County, Illinois $2,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, Cook County, Illinois. (622) Chicago, Illinois $1,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply, City of Chicago, Illinois. (623) Mattoon, Illinois $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply and water quality enhancements, City of Mattoon, Illinois. (624) Maumee River Basin, Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan $20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, and stormwater management, Maumee River Basin, Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan. (625) Ogallala Aquifer, Kansas $30,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including wastewater treatment, aquifer storage and recovery infrastructure, and surface water resource protection, Ogallala Aquifer, Kansas. (626) Bossier City, Louisiana $10,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, and water treatment, Bossier City, Louisiana. (627) Holyoke, Massachusetts $15,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, City of Holyoke, Massachusetts. (628) Somerset, Massachusetts $2,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Town of Somerset, Massachusetts. (629) Greenfield, Massachusetts $9,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, City of Greenfield, Massachusetts. (630) Swansea, Massachusetts $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply and water quality enhancements, Swansea, Massachusetts. (631) Rochester, Minnesota $10,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water storage and water supply, and water quality enhancements, City of Rochester, Minnesota. (632) Brandon, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Brandon, Mississippi. (633) Choctaw County, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure (including stormwater management), drainage systems, and water quality enhancements, Choctaw County, Mississippi. (634) Columbus, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Columbus, Mississippi. (635) Flowood, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, stormwater management, drainage systems, and water quality enhancements, City of Flowood, Mississippi. (636) Forest, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Forest, Mississippi. (637) Hattiesburg, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure (including stormwater management), drainage systems, and water quality enhancements, Hattiesburg, Mississippi. (638) Lucedale, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, stormwater management, drainage systems, and water quality enhancements, City of Lucedale, Mississippi. (639) Natchez, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, stormwater management, drainage systems, and water quality enhancements, City of Natchez, Mississippi. (640) Vicksburg, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, stormwater management, water supply, and water quality enhancements, City of Vicksburg, Mississippi. (641) Jackson County, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, and stormwater management, Jackson County, Mississippi. (642) West Point, Mississippi $5,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, rehabilitation of storage tanks, system pressure improvements, and water treatment upgrades, City of West Point, Mississippi. (643) Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Passaic, and Union Counties, New Jersey $8,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water quality enhancements, in the communities served by the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission, Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Passaic, and Union Counties, New Jersey. (644) Gloucester City, New Jersey $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including flooding resiliency measures for such infrastructure, and environmental restoration, City of Gloucester City, New Jersey. (645) Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico $1,500,000 for water infrastructure, including water supply and water storage, Pueblo of Nambe, New Mexico. (646) Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico $3,000,000 for water infrastructure, including water supply, water storage, and water treatment, Pueblo of Acoma, New Mexico. (647) Nassau County, New York $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Nassau County, New York. (648) Suffolk County, New York $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Suffolk County, New York. (649) Westchester County, New York $5,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Westchester County, New York. (650) Tompkins County, New York $3,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Tompkins County, New York. (651) Onondoga County, New York $3,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Onondoga County, New York. (652) Oswego County, New York $3,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Oswego County, New York. (653) Grand Island, New York $2,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Town of Grand Island, New York. (654) Asheville, North Carolina $15,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, water supply, and stormwater management, City of Asheville, North Carolina. (655) Greenville, North Carolina $10,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Greenville, North Carolina. (656) Brown County, Ohio $2,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including drinking water infrastructure, Brown County, Ohio. (657) Clarksburg, Ohio $2,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, Clarksburg, Ohio. (658) Jefferson County, Ohio $6,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, drinking water infrastructure, and water supply, Jefferson County, Ohio. (659) Massillon, Ohio $2,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water quality improvements, City of Massillon, Ohio. (660) Struthers, Ohio $3,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Struthers, Ohio. (661) Trumbull County, Ohio $2,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water quality improvements, Trumbull County, Ohio. (662) Waverly, Ohio $3,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, and water supply, Waverly, Ohio. (663) Wellston, Ohio $6,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, and water supply, City of Wellston, Ohio. (664) Willamette Valley, Oregon $33,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply, water treatment, and water storage, Willamette Valley, Oregon. (665) Rhode island (A) In general $71,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure (including water supply, storage, treatment, and distribution facilities), resource protection and development, environmental restoration, and other environmental infrastructure assistance in Rhode Island. (B) Economically disadvantaged communities Notwithstanding subsection (b), the Federal share of the cost of a project under this paragraph benefitting an economically disadvantaged community (as defined pursuant to section 160 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note; Public Law 116–260)) shall be 90 percent. (666) Berkeley County, South Carolina $20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, Berkeley County, South Carolina. (667) Centerville, Utah $20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, water supply, stormwater management, water quality enhancements, and aquifer storage and recovery infrastructure, City of Centerville, Utah. (668) Ephraim, Utah $20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including water and wastewater infrastructure, City of Ephraim, Utah. (669) Fairfax County and Prince William County, Virginia $8,666,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water reclamation and resource protection and development, in the communities served by the Upper Occoquan Service Authority, Fairfax County and Prince William County, Virginia. (670) Orange County, Virginia $8,666,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water treatment and storage, Orange County, Virginia. (671) Henrico County, Virginia $8,666,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, Henrico County, Virginia. (672) Camas, Washington $4,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water quality enhancements, City of Camas, Washington. (673) Quincy, Washington $4,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including aquifer storage and recovery, City of Quincy, Washington. (674) Airway Heights, Washington $3,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, including water supply, water treatment, and water quality enhancements, City of Airway Heights, Washington. (675) Sunnyside, Washington $2,000,000 for water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure, City of Sunnyside, Washington.. (c) Project modifications (1) Consistency with reports Congress finds that the project modifications described in this subsection are in accordance with the reports submitted to Congress by the Secretary under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), entitled Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development, or have otherwise been reviewed by Congress. (2) Modifications (A) Buckeye, Arizona Section 219(f)(406) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking $12,000,000 and inserting $20,000,000. (B) Page, Arizona Section 219(f)(409) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking $10,000,000 and inserting $20,000,000. (C) Tucson, Arizona Section 219(f)(412) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking $30,000,000 and inserting $35,000,000. (D) Butte County, California Section 219(f)(419) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended by striking $50,000,000 and inserting $53,000,000. (E) San Bernardino County, California Section 219(f)(101) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1260; 138 Stat. 3128) is amended— (i) by striking $24,000,000 and inserting $27,000,000; (ii) by inserting, stormwater, after wastewater; and (iii) by striking Chino and Chino Hills,. (F) Salinas, California Section 219(f)(450) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3118) is amended— (i) by striking $20,000,000 and inserting $22,222,000; and (ii) by inserting and stormwater infrastructure, including flood resiliency measures for such infrastructure, after water supply,. (G) Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, Bay–Delta, California Section 219(f)(416) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3116) is amended— (i) by inserting environmental restoration, resource protection and development, after drainage systems,; and (ii) by striking Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and inserting Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins. (H) Santa Monica, California Section 219(f)(103) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1260) is amended— (i) by striking $3,000,000 and inserting $5,222,000; and (ii) by inserting and stormwater management and water quality enhancements after reliability. (I) Montezuma and La Plata Counties, Colorado Section 219(f)(110) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1260) is amended— (i) by striking $1,000,000 and inserting $7,000,000; and (ii) by inserting and for water supply after project. (J) Muscogee, Henry, and Clayton Counties, Georgia Section 219(f)(477) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3120) is amended by striking $10,000,000 and inserting $20,000,000. (K) East Point, Georgia Section 219(f)(136) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1261; 138 Stat. 3129) is amended by striking $20,000,000 and inserting $23,000,000. (L) Atlanta, Georgia Section 219(e)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3129) is amended by striking $100,000,000 and inserting $110,000,000. (M) DeKalb County, Georgia Section 219(f)(479) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3120) is amended by striking $40,000,000 and inserting $43,000,000. (N) Cook County and Lake County, Illinois Section 219(f)(54) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3129) is amended by striking $149,000,000 and inserting $162,000,000. (O) Maryland Section 219(f)(341) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3812) is amended by striking $100,000,000 and inserting $113,000,000. (P) Haverhill, Massachusetts Section 219(f)(337) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3812; 138 Stat. 3130) is amended by striking $30,000,000 and inserting $37,000,000. (Q) Michigan Section 219(f)(157)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1262; 136 Stat. 3818; 138 Stat. 3130) is amended by striking $160,000,000 and inserting $186,000,000. (R) Clinton, Raymond, and Bolton, Mississippi Section 219(f)(350) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended— (i) in the paragraph heading, by inserting Raymond, and Bolton, after Clinton,; (ii) by striking $13,600,000 and inserting $18,600,000; and (iii) by striking the city of Clinton, Mississippi and inserting the cities of Clinton and Raymond and the town of Bolton, Mississippi. (S) Madison County, Mississippi Section 219(f)(351) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3813; 138 Stat. 3131) is amended by striking $24,000,000 and inserting $29,000,000. (T) Oxford, Mississippi Section 219(f)(353) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3813) is amended by striking $10,000,000 and inserting $15,000,000. (U) Picayune, Mississippi Section 219(f)(512) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3122) is amended by striking $5,000,000 and inserting $10,000,000. (V) New Hampshire Section 219(f)(518) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3122) is amended by striking $25,000,000 and inserting $30,000,000. (W) Farmington, New Mexico Section 219(f)(372) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3814) is amended by inserting and stormwater management after water supply,. (X) Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina Section 219(f)(194) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1264) is amended— (i) by striking $6,000,000 and inserting $11,000,000; and (ii) by inserting and water supply after sewer upgrades. (Y) Toledo and Oregon, Ohio Section 219(f)(565) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 138 Stat. 3125) is amended by striking $10,500,000 and inserting $45,000,000. (Z) Charleston, South Carolina Section 219(f)(391) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 3815) is amended by striking $25,583,000 and inserting $45,583,000. (AA) Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 138 Stat. 3132) is amended by striking $235,000,000 and inserting $240,000,000.
added wordsremoved wordsComparison computed by Public Law Tracker from the official text